Overview
Medical Informatics
Surveillance
Biometrics
Policy and Law
|
Policy and Law: Identifiability of de-identified data[cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite, cite] Problem Statement: Given person-specific data de-identified to a standard, provide methods that report the number of people that can be re-identified from the data and/or whether the data satisfies the standard. Description: Dr. Sweeney's first contribution involved linking de-identified patient-specific medical data to a population register (e.g., a voter list) to re-identify patients by name [cite, cite]. She then showed that "87% of the U.S. Population are uniquely identified by {date of birth, gender, ZIP}." Her contributions expanded to include experiments on the identifiability of de-identified survey data [cite], pharmacy data [cite], clinical trial data [cite], criminal data [State of Delaware v. Gannett Publishing], DNA [cite, cite, cite], tax data, public health registries [cite (sealed by court), etc.], web logs, and partial Social Security numbers [cite]. A key related technology is the Risk assessment server, described separately. Her current work introduces “Fair Data Sharing Practices,” a set of practices weaved with accompanying technologies that help assure compliance, as a way for society to move forward with data sharing while assuring privacy protections [cite].
Scientific Influence and Impact: Dr. Sweeney's earliest work was discussed and cited as reasons for approaches taken in the HIPAA Privacy Rule [Gellman, Federal Register, et al.]. Four court decisions cite and discuss her re-identifications, and in one case, her method was sealed [Southern Illinoisian v. Dept. of Public Health]. Researchers have replicated her experiments in other countries [Emam, et al.]. Legal scholars discuss ramifications [Kerr, et al.] and offer new legal theories to address her findings [Rothstein, Ohm, Weitzner, et al.]. Other Achievements: 12
|